Toyo Open Country AT3 vs BF Goodrich KO2
Toyo and BF Goodrich are two established tire manufacturers with decades of experience in off-road tires. The Toyo Open Country AT3 was launched in 2018, while the BF Goodrich KO2 has been available since 2014. Choosing the right all-terrain tire is crucial for optimal performance both on and off-road. This comparison analyzes the characteristics of both models to help you make an informed buying decision.
215/75 R15 100T SUV
In stock
215/75 R15 100S SUV
In stock
Advantages: Toyo Open Country AT3 or BF Goodrich KO2
Toyo Open Country AT3 Advantages
- Excellent traction on various surfaces due to aggressive tread design
- High mileage due to robust rubber compound and reinforced sidewalls
- Good road performance with reduced rolling resistance
- Strong self-cleaning properties thanks to optimized lug configuration
- Improved wet grip thanks to special sipe technology
BF Goodrich KO2 advantages
- Exceptional off-road capability thanks to proven tread design
- Extremely robust sidewall construction with CoreGard technology
- Excellent traction on rocky and stony surfaces
- Long service life thanks to durable rubber compound
- Reliable performance in extreme temperatures
Disadvantages: BF Goodrich KO2 vs Toyo Open Country AT3
Toyo Open Country AT3 disadvantages
- Higher noise level at high speeds
- Limited availability in specific sizes
- Average performance on loose sand
BF Goodrich KO2 Disadvantages
- Increased fuel consumption due to higher rolling resistance
- Harder handling on asphalt
- Longer braking distances on wet roads
- Higher acquisition costs
BF GOODRICH ALL Terrain T/A KO2 tyres
All sizes
Comparison table of technical specifications BF Goodrich KO2 or Toyo Open Country AT3
Feature |
Toyo Open Country AT3 |
BF Goodrich KO2 |
Tire type |
All-Terrain |
All-Terrain |
Width (mm) |
215-315 |
215-315 |
Height (%) |
45-85 |
50-85 |
Type of construction |
Radial |
Radial |
inch |
15-22 |
15-22 |
Load index |
95-126 |
95-126 |
Speed index |
Q-T |
Q-T |
Rim protection |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
Run-flat tires |
No |
No |
Reinforced / XL |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
C tires |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
Yes (for selected sizes) |
Fuel efficiency (EU label) |
C-E |
D-F |
Wet grip (EU label) |
B-C |
C-D |
Noise class / noise level |
2-3 / 71-75 dB |
2-3 / 72-76 dB |
Similarities: Toyo Open Country AT3 against BF Goodrich KO2
- All-terrain construction: Both tires are designed for use on a variety of surfaces from asphalt to moderate terrain
- Robust sidewall construction: Reinforced sidewalls provide protection against damage from stones and sharp objects
- All-season suitability: Both models are suitable for use in various weather conditions
- Aggressive tread design: Deep lugs and grooves ensure optimum traction off-road
- Self-cleaning properties: The tread design allows dirt and stones to be expelled
- High-quality rubber compound: Both use special compounds for durability and performance
- Wide range of sizes: Availability in different dimensions for different vehicle types
Differences: Open Country AT3 vs KO2
Feature |
Toyo Open Country AT3 |
BF Goodrich KO2 |
Tread pattern |
Symmetrical design with variable lug sizes |
Asymmetric design with large outer lugs |
Rubber Compound |
Silica reinforced compound |
Traditional rubber compound with CoreGard technology |
Main strength |
Balanced on-road and off-road performance |
Maximum off-road capability |
Mileage |
Up to 100,000 km |
Up to 80,000 km |
Rolling resistance |
Reduced rolling resistance |
Higher rolling resistance |
Wet grip |
Improved wet grip due to sipes |
Basic wet grip |
Dry grip |
Good road grip |
Excellent off-road grip |
Special features |
Optimized road holding |
CoreGard sidewall protection |
Conclusion
The Toyo Open Country AT3 and the BF Goodrich KO2 represent two different approaches in the all-terrain segment. The Open Country AT3 offers a more balanced performance with better on-road capability and fuel efficiency, while the KO2 is characterized by extreme off-road capability and robustness. Drivers who mainly drive on paved roads and occasionally go off-road will benefit from the Toyo Open Country AT3. The BF Goodrich KO2 is better suited to enthusiasts who regularly drive on demanding terrain and require maximum robustness.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Which tire offers better mileage?
The Toyo Open Country AT3 typically achieves a higher mileage of up to 100,000 km. This is due to the optimized rubber compound and the more even wear behaviour. The BF Goodrich KO2 achieves around 80,000 km under normal use.
How do the tires differ in terms of noise development?
The Toyo Open Country AT3 is optimized for road smoothness and produces less driving noise at high speeds. The BF Goodrich KO2 has a higher noise level due to its more aggressive tread pattern, especially on asphalt.
Which tire is more fuel efficient?
The Toyo Open Country AT3 has a lower rolling resistance and achieves better fuel efficiency values. Due to its robust design, the BF Goodrich KO2 has a higher rolling resistance and therefore higher fuel consumption.
Both tires are suitable for all-season use, but are not certified as winter tires. The Toyo Open Country AT3 offers better traction on snow and ice thanks to its siping technology. The BF Goodrich KO2 offers solid winter performance in moderate conditions.
Which tire is better suited for difficult terrain?
The BF Goodrich KO2 is specially designed for extreme terrain and offers better sidewall protection thanks to its CoreGard technology. The aggressive tread design provides superior traction on rocky and stony surfaces.
How do the prices of the two tires differ?
The BF Goodrich KO2 is typically priced 10-15% higher than the Toyo Open Country AT3. This price difference reflects the specialized construction and brand positioning.
Which tire offers better wet grip?
The Toyo Open Country AT3 achieves better wet grip values due to its modern siped tread design. The BF Goodrich KO2 shows rock-solid wet grip, but is primarily optimized for off-road traction.