Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs PS71
Kumho is a South Korean tire manufacturer that has established itself as a reliable supplier of high-performance tires for decades. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 was launched in 2018, while the PS71 was launched in 2020. When choosing the right summer tire, factors such as driving dynamics, safety and durability play a decisive role in vehicle performance. This comparative article analyzes the characteristic features of both Kumho models to help you make an informed purchasing decision.
215/45 ZR17 91W XL
In stock
215/45 ZR17 91Y XL
In stock
Advantages: Kumho Ecsta HS52 or Kumho Ecsta PS71
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Advantages
- Balanced handling with good balance between comfort and sportiness
- Solid wet grip due to optimized tread design
- Attractive price-performance ratio in the middle class
- Good smoothness at highway speeds
- Adequate wear resistance for daily use
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Advantages
- Superior dry grip for sporty driving
- Precise steering response and direct feel
- High stability during fast cornering
- Robust sidewall construction for better driving dynamics
- Optimized rubber compound for high performance applications
Disadvantages: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52 disadvantages
- Limited sportiness when driving aggressively
- Reduced precision in extreme driving situations
- Compromises in high speed performance
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Disadvantages
- Higher rolling resistance leads to increased fuel consumption
- Reduced ride comfort due to sporty design
- Shorter service life with intensive use
- Higher noise development at low speeds
Comparison table of technical specifications Kumho Ecsta PS71 or Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Characteristic |
Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
| Tire type |
Summer tire |
Summer tire |
| Width (mm) |
195-275 |
205-275 |
| Height (%) |
35-65 |
35-55 |
| Type of construction |
Radial |
Radial |
| inch |
15-20 |
16-20 |
| Load index |
82-103 |
84-103 |
| Speed index |
V-Y |
W-Y |
| Rim protection |
Partially available |
Partially available |
| Run-flat tires |
No |
No |
| Reinforced / XL |
Yes |
Yes |
| C tires |
No |
No |
| Fuel efficiency (EU label) |
C-E |
D-E |
| Wet grip (EU label) |
B-C |
B-C |
| Noise class / noise level |
2/71-73 dB |
2/72-74 dB |
Similarities: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Asymmetric tread design: Optimized tread design for improved traction and even wear
- Silica-reinforced rubber compound: Advanced compound technology for better grip and reduced rolling resistance
- Stiff shoulder areas: Reinforced sidewalls for precise steering response and stability in corners
- Optimized groove geometry: Sophisticated water drainage for improved aquaplaning resistance
- DOT certification: Official approval for the American market with corresponding safety standards
- European tire labeling: Compliance with the EU label regulation with transparent efficiency values
- Modern production technology: Manufactured using the latest production processes for consistent quality
Differences: Ecsta HS52 vs PS71
| Characteristic |
Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
| Tread pattern |
Comfort-oriented groove structure |
Sport-oriented block design |
| Rubber compound |
Balanced all-round compound |
High performance compound |
| Main strength |
Versatility and comfort |
Sporty performance |
| Mileage |
Increased mileage |
Reduced mileage |
| Rolling resistance |
Lower rolling resistance |
Higher rolling resistance |
| Wet grip |
Solid wet grip |
Good wet grip |
| Dry grip |
Adequate dry grip |
Superior dry grip |
| Special features |
Price-performance optimization |
Performance focus |
Conclusion
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 represent different philosophies within the summer tire category. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is ideal for drivers looking for a balanced combination of comfort, economy and solid performance. The Kumho Ecsta PS71, on the other hand, is aimed at sporty drivers who are willing to compromise on comfort and mileage for superior driving dynamics. Both models meet modern safety standards and offer reliable performance in their respective areas of use.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Which tire offers better fuel efficiency?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 tends to show better fuel efficiency values in the EU label. The lower rolling resistance leads to reduced fuel consumption, especially on longer highway drives.
Are both tires suitable for sports cars?
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is specifically designed for sporty applications and offers superior performance for aggressive driving. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is more suitable for moderate sportiness and everyday use.
What is the difference in service life between the two models?
Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers longer mileage due to its balanced rubber compound. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 shows faster wear during intensive use due to its sporty design.
Which tire is quieter when driving?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 produces less rolling noise due to its comfort-oriented design. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 produces slightly higher noise levels due to its sporty tread design.
Are there differences in aquaplaning resistance?
Both tires have modern groove geometry for water drainage. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 shows slight advantages in aquaplaning resistance due to its optimized tread pattern.
What size range is available?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers a wider size range of 15-20 inches, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 focuses on 16-20 inches. Both cover common passenger car dimensions.
Are the tires suitable for year-round use?
Both models are pure summer tires and not designed for winter conditions. Winter tires should be used in temperatures below 7°C.
23 September 2025 (updated) 
