Table of Contents
12 September 2025 (updated) Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 Reviews
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is a winter tire aimed at drivers looking for reliable winter performance. In the ÖAMTC winter tire test 2016, the tire was tested in the dimension 225/45 R17 91 H and received an overall rating of 2.3.
| Test organization | Year | Dimension | Test result |
|---|---|---|---|
| ÖAMTC | 2016 | 225/45 R17 91 H | 3,3 |
Popular tire sizes of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
225/50 R17 98H XL
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 XL Winter tyres
Сurrently out of stock
£ 143,97
Price per item
225/55 R17 97H
Bridgestone Blizzak Lm001 Winter tyres
Сurrently out of stock
£ 118,82
Price per item
205/55 R16 91H
Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM001 RFT R Winter tyres
Сurrently out of stock
£ 134,19
Price per item
205/60 R16 96H XL
Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM001 XL FP XL Winter tyres
Сurrently out of stock
£ 116,63
Price per item
195/65 R15 91T
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO Winter tyres
Сurrently out of stock
£ 62,92
Price per item
Bridgestone Blizzak Lm001 tyres
Performance on snow
The snow performance reviews of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 showed mixed results in the test. The tire scored 3.0 in braking with ABS on snow, which is a satisfactory performance. Starting off on snow was rated at 3.5, which is classified as sufficient. Passing and handling on snow received a score of 3.4, which is also in the sufficient range. Overall, the snow performance was rated with an overall score of 3.3, which shows that the tire definitely has weaknesses on snow. This rating is reflected in the weighting of 20% for the snow test criterion.
ÖAMTC 2016 snow braking (ABS): Grade 3.0 - satisfactory braking performance on snowy roads, starting off on snow: Grade 3.5 - sufficient traction when starting off. Passing & handling on snow: Grade 3.4 - sufficient driving characteristics when driving on snow.
Performance on wet roads
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 performed significantly better on wet roads than on snow. Braking on wet roads was rated at 2.8, which corresponds to a satisfactory performance. Particularly noteworthy is the very good longitudinal aquaplaning performance with a score of 1.5, while the transverse aquaplaning was rated 2.0, which is also good. Handling on wet roads was rated at 2.6, which corresponds to a satisfactory grade. Circular and lateral control on wet roads achieved a score of 3.0. Overall, wet performance received an overall score of 2.5 with a weighting of 30%.
ÖAMTC 2016 wet braking: Grade 2.8 - satisfactory braking performance on wet roads. Aquaplaning longitudinal: Grade 1.5 - very good resistance to aquaplaning in longitudinal direction. Aquaplaning lateral: Grade 2.0 - good stability in lateral aquaplaning.
Dry handling
On dry roads, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 demonstrated its best performance in the entire test. The handling on dry roads was rated with a very good score of 1.8. Driving safety on dry roads also received the same very good rating of 1.8. However, braking on dry roads was only given a score of 3.0, which corresponds to a satisfactory performance. The overall score for dry performance was 2.1 with a weighting of 15%. These results show that the tire offers fundamentally reliable driving characteristics on dry roads, even if the braking performance has potential for improvement.
ÖAMTC 2016 dry driving performance: Score 1.8 - very good handling on dry roads. Dry driving safety: Grade 1.8 - very good safety characteristics on dry roads. Dry braking: Grade 3.0 - satisfactory braking performance on dry roads
Braking performance
The braking performance of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 varied considerably depending on the road conditions. On ice, the tire showed its best braking performance with a score of 2.3 in ABS braking. On wet roads, the tire achieved a braking score of 2.8. The weakest braking performance was on dry roads with a score of 3.0, which only corresponds to a satisfactory rating. On snow, ABS braking also received a score of 3.0. These different ratings show that the tire has very different braking characteristics depending on the surface. Ice braking performance was assessed with a 60% weighting for the ice test criterion.
ÖAMTC 2016 ice braking (ABS): Grade 2.3 - good braking performance on icy roads. Wet braking: Grade 2.8 - satisfactory braking performance on wet roads. Snow braking (ABS): Grade 3.0 - satisfactory braking performance on snow
Economy
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 showed very positive characteristics in terms of economy. Fuel consumption was given a very good score of 2.1, which, with a weighting of 10%, contributes to a good overall result. Wear also received a very good rating of 2.0 with a weighting of 10%. These values show that the tire is both economical in consumption and has a good service life. The manufacturer's tire label shows a rolling resistance rating of E, which underlines this rating. The good economy values make the tire a cost-effective choice for winter drivers. The low wear means a longer service life and therefore better overall economy.
ÖAMTC 2016 fuel consumption: Grade 2.1 - very good fuel consumption
ÖAMTC 2016 wear: Grade 2.0 - very good wear properties
Noise development
The noise development of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 proved to be problematic. The interior noise received a poor rating of 4.5, which is the worst rating in the entire test. The external noise, on the other hand, was rated significantly better at 2.8. The overall score for noise behavior was 3.7 with a weighting of 5%. According to the manufacturer's information on the tire label, the external noise is 72 dB. This high level of interior noise can significantly impair driving comfort and is a clear weakness of the tire. The discrepancy between interior and exterior noise shows that noise transmission into the vehicle interior is particularly problematic.
ÖAMTC 2016 interior noise: Grade 4.5 - inadequate interior noise behavior. Exterior noise: Grade 2.8 - satisfactory exterior noise behavior
Price-performance ratio
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is positioned as a winter tire with mixed performance characteristics. The very good properties on dry roads and solid economy are offset by weaker performance on snow and problematic interior noise. The tire is particularly suitable for drivers who mainly drive on cleared roads and are less frequently confronted with extreme snow conditions. The good fuel efficiency and low wear can save costs in the long term. However, buyers should take into account the weaknesses in snow performance and comfort due to the high interior noise when making their decision. The ÖAMTC recommendation is in the recommendable range, which is a fundamentally positive assessment.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 experience: Advantages and weaknesses
| Advantages | Weak points |
|---|---|
| Good economy due to low fuel consumption | Weaknesses in snow performance |
| Very good wear resistance | High interior noise impairs driving comfort |
| Very good handling characteristics on dry roads | Only satisfactory braking performance on various surfaces |
| Good aquaplaning properties in longitudinal direction | - |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 test report
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 reviews received an overall score of 2.3 in the 2016 ÖAMTC test, putting it in the recommended range. The tire particularly impressed with its economy and dry performance, but showed weaknesses in snow performance and interior noise. It is a solid choice for drivers with mixed winter conditions.
Source list
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | ÖAMTC
